Pre-1964 model .30-30 question
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I was at Cabelas yesterday looking through the inventory of used guns. Ran across a pre-1964 model .30-30 that really sparked my interest. What I want to know is when did Winchester drop the .30 WCF stamp on the barrel of the model 94s? My good friend has a 1953 model .30-30 that is stamped with .30-30 on the barrel. And lastly seeing as how I am in the market for a pre-1964 .30-30 is $600 a fair price or should I really have it inspected for wear prior to purchase?
1968 Winchester model 94 .32 Winhester Special (granddaddy's gun)
|
|
This is a SWAG from Robert C. Renneberg's "The Winchester Model 94 The First 100 Hundred Years" reference book. Robert indicates the change was somewhere between serials 1,250.000 to 2,000.000. However, Winchester factory records indicate no numbers in the range of 1943-47 are available for YOM dates. Picks up at 1948 serial 1,500.000. The 2,000.000 range begins with 1953. Perhaps other members have access to a more precise listing.
GOA Life Member
NRA Sustaining Member USMC Korea vet Retired CWO3 USCGR |
|
Old thread, but this might help. Or not.
My 1951 Model 94 (s/n 1747xxx) is marked "- Model 94 - 30-30 Win -" on the left side below the rear sight and in front of the receiver. However. The underside of the barrel above the magazine tube is stamped "30 WCF". It can't be seen with the magazine tube in place, but I noticed it because I took the gun apart to refinish the stock. So, technically, it's marked with both. |
|
Your 94 is right at the change !!! it's a way to pin point the change in production !!!still a good buy ..any timeyou can find a deal on a pre '64 grab it!!!!! you can always change the barrel to a different cal. ![]() Do The Best With What You Have!!!!
|
|
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Winchester Model 1894
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests
Winchester Owners Forum is privately owned and operated. It is not affiliated or operated by Winchester company.
Views and opinions expressed here are not necessarily that of Winchester.